<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Not Me!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.seomunchies.com/seo-munchies-news/not-me/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.seomunchies.com/seo-munchies-news/not-me/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Jan 2011 21:45:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stuart</title>
		<link>http://www.seomunchies.com/seo-munchies-news/not-me/comment-page-1/#comment-582</link>
		<dc:creator>Stuart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2010 16:28:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seomunchies.com/?p=1026#comment-582</guid>
		<description>Tomjack - I think the problem is that even with a few people, when they are creating 10,000 blogs, the public places soon shut you down.
 
My gut feeling tells me that Chad and Keith are not using public MUs predominatly. They are getting set up with SEo Hosting. Have 20+ IPs, and creating there own network, that NEVER gets taken down, because they control it.
 
I am hanging fire at the moment to see if Chad comes up with an update. Its been almost two weeks since he posted the front page posts where he said he was working on something. So hopefully something cool is in the pipeline.

A little transparency would be nice. How about setting up a project Chad that makes $200 a month and videoing the whole thing? I realise its a little like a &#039;sacrficial lamb&#039; once you release it for that particular project, but then if this thing is as easy to make money with as you say, then creating another one really shouldn&#039;t be a big deal.
 
At the moment this program is a bit of turkey for me. And I feel a bit frustrated. Because its yet another of those &#039;Shell out $200 - Get No Results&#039; experiences (Or $400 if you include SEO Trackbacks). But I think its one of those things that maybe with a few tweaks could turn into something quite nice.
 
I just doubt very much that Chad or Keith are ACTUALLY using this thing in the way they say. If they are, then how come no-one seems to be replicating their results?
 
I don&#039;t see anyone else even remotely talking about things like that $2900 post of Chads. The only results I got when I used SEO Trackbacks for example was that my rankings all dropped. And I have already spoken about my experience thus far with Traffic X, which is non-existent in terms of results.
 
And Chad never answers support emails in my experience, so its not as though there is anyone to ask.
 
Ok. Rant over. Hopefully Chad will put in an appearance at some stage and show he still exists.
 
 
 
 
 </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tomjack &#8211; I think the problem is that even with a few people, when they are creating 10,000 blogs, the public places soon shut you down.<br />
 <br />
My gut feeling tells me that Chad and Keith are not using public MUs predominatly. They are getting set up with SEo Hosting. Have 20+ IPs, and creating there own network, that NEVER gets taken down, because they control it.<br />
 <br />
I am hanging fire at the moment to see if Chad comes up with an update. Its been almost two weeks since he posted the front page posts where he said he was working on something. So hopefully something cool is in the pipeline.</p>
<p>A little transparency would be nice. How about setting up a project Chad that makes $200 a month and videoing the whole thing? I realise its a little like a &#8216;sacrficial lamb&#8217; once you release it for that particular project, but then if this thing is as easy to make money with as you say, then creating another one really shouldn&#8217;t be a big deal.<br />
 <br />
At the moment this program is a bit of turkey for me. And I feel a bit frustrated. Because its yet another of those &#8216;Shell out $200 &#8211; Get No Results&#8217; experiences (Or $400 if you include SEO Trackbacks). But I think its one of those things that maybe with a few tweaks could turn into something quite nice.<br />
 <br />
I just doubt very much that Chad or Keith are ACTUALLY using this thing in the way they say. If they are, then how come no-one seems to be replicating their results?<br />
 <br />
I don&#8217;t see anyone else even remotely talking about things like that $2900 post of Chads. The only results I got when I used SEO Trackbacks for example was that my rankings all dropped. And I have already spoken about my experience thus far with Traffic X, which is non-existent in terms of results.<br />
 <br />
And Chad never answers support emails in my experience, so its not as though there is anyone to ask.<br />
 <br />
Ok. Rant over. Hopefully Chad will put in an appearance at some stage and show he still exists.<br />
 <br />
 <br />
 <br />
 <br />
 </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bamafan</title>
		<link>http://www.seomunchies.com/seo-munchies-news/not-me/comment-page-1/#comment-579</link>
		<dc:creator>bamafan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2010 13:11:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seomunchies.com/?p=1026#comment-579</guid>
		<description>I like the above idea.  I am wondering about the use of MAMv2.  In regards to anyone&#039;s recent success with it.  I am at the posting on hubpages stage, and expect to later this week start posting on the several thousand blogs I have created.  I need a lot more input, in terms of general guidance.  I know Chad is backed up at the moment, and he has a new baby (congrats), so maybe someone can email me with an idea at pointers that are more recent than Feb. 2010.  Please email me @ runnerlife21@yahoo.com.  ANY input is appreciated, and I AM willing to setup MUs, so contact me about that as well.  Great idea TomJack!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the above idea.  I am wondering about the use of MAMv2.  In regards to anyone&#8217;s recent success with it.  I am at the posting on hubpages stage, and expect to later this week start posting on the several thousand blogs I have created.  I need a lot more input, in terms of general guidance.  I know Chad is backed up at the moment, and he has a new baby (congrats), so maybe someone can email me with an idea at pointers that are more recent than Feb. 2010.  Please email me @ <a href="mailto:runnerlife21@yahoo.com">runnerlife21@yahoo.com</a>.  ANY input is appreciated, and I AM willing to setup MUs, so contact me about that as well.  Great idea TomJack!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tomjack</title>
		<link>http://www.seomunchies.com/seo-munchies-news/not-me/comment-page-1/#comment-577</link>
		<dc:creator>tomjack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2010 05:41:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seomunchies.com/?p=1026#comment-577</guid>
		<description>I think it&#039;s about time we all get together and create a few MU accounts that we can all post to.  It&#039;s obvious from the posts that everyone is having a hard time finding verified MU hosts.  I, for one, have only added one new verified MU host in the past 5 days.  Why don&#039;t we each spend the time and money to create 5 or 10 MU domains, and we then we&#039;ll all have a large MU network we can all post to?  It would only take a couple days to setup, and if only 20 of us agree to participate, we&#039;d have several hundred MU hosts to create accounts on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#8217;s about time we all get together and create a few MU accounts that we can all post to.  It&#8217;s obvious from the posts that everyone is having a hard time finding verified MU hosts.  I, for one, have only added one new verified MU host in the past 5 days.  Why don&#8217;t we each spend the time and money to create 5 or 10 MU domains, and we then we&#8217;ll all have a large MU network we can all post to?  It would only take a couple days to setup, and if only 20 of us agree to participate, we&#8217;d have several hundred MU hosts to create accounts on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stuart</title>
		<link>http://www.seomunchies.com/seo-munchies-news/not-me/comment-page-1/#comment-558</link>
		<dc:creator>Stuart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jun 2010 08:35:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seomunchies.com/?p=1026#comment-558</guid>
		<description>Ok Thanks for the update. Will have a look at my setup. But honestly, its totally standard. I wonder if when you actually click the &#039;Delete Bad Blogs&#039; you may find that more go? The XMLRPC check is only one check I would imagine, where as the &#039;Delete Bad Blogs&#039; probably actually registers where it has tried to make a post a failed. So is probably a more comprehensive check and may well include more of them.  In any case, its worth running it, because its better to know the reality, rather then constantly posting to blogs that may not even exist
 
Would be interested in others experiences with the longevity of these blogs.
 
My own experience (so far) is not promising. And if you look at any of the support documentation or videos then there are actually a lot of blogs mentioned or in the background so you can see them to check.
 
Not a single one of them is still alive.
 
Chad - Are you actually still collecting public MU blogs with this yourself for your own use? Or have you set up your own MU blog farm to post to?
 
It seems to me like the latter choice is the only way to have blogs survive longer then a few weeks.
 
If you are doing the latter then can you elaborate or do a video on how you are going about doing that? As I am struggling to come up with ways to use this if I cannot get a decent number of blogs to post too.
 </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok Thanks for the update. Will have a look at my setup. But honestly, its totally standard. I wonder if when you actually click the &#8216;Delete Bad Blogs&#8217; you may find that more go? The XMLRPC check is only one check I would imagine, where as the &#8216;Delete Bad Blogs&#8217; probably actually registers where it has tried to make a post a failed. So is probably a more comprehensive check and may well include more of them.  In any case, its worth running it, because its better to know the reality, rather then constantly posting to blogs that may not even exist<br />
 <br />
Would be interested in others experiences with the longevity of these blogs.<br />
 <br />
My own experience (so far) is not promising. And if you look at any of the support documentation or videos then there are actually a lot of blogs mentioned or in the background so you can see them to check.<br />
 <br />
Not a single one of them is still alive.<br />
 <br />
Chad &#8211; Are you actually still collecting public MU blogs with this yourself for your own use? Or have you set up your own MU blog farm to post to?<br />
 <br />
It seems to me like the latter choice is the only way to have blogs survive longer then a few weeks.<br />
 <br />
If you are doing the latter then can you elaborate or do a video on how you are going about doing that? As I am struggling to come up with ways to use this if I cannot get a decent number of blogs to post too.<br />
 </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tomjack</title>
		<link>http://www.seomunchies.com/seo-munchies-news/not-me/comment-page-1/#comment-557</link>
		<dc:creator>tomjack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jun 2010 07:37:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seomunchies.com/?p=1026#comment-557</guid>
		<description>I may try that- but FYI- when I ran enable xmlrpc, I had about 10,000 blogs in my file, and after it ran, it said it found 4900 bad blogs.  So, it sounds like something may be wrong with your setup or the program.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I may try that- but FYI- when I ran enable xmlrpc, I had about 10,000 blogs in my file, and after it ran, it said it found 4900 bad blogs.  So, it sounds like something may be wrong with your setup or the program.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stuart</title>
		<link>http://www.seomunchies.com/seo-munchies-news/not-me/comment-page-1/#comment-552</link>
		<dc:creator>Stuart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2010 22:16:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seomunchies.com/?p=1026#comment-552</guid>
		<description>Tomjack - Please do a posting run with the &#039;Delete Bad Blogs&#039; ticked and post how many survive. When I did this my blogs went down from 8000 to 240. So I would be interested to see if its just me, or if other people have the same experience.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tomjack &#8211; Please do a posting run with the &#8216;Delete Bad Blogs&#8217; ticked and post how many survive. When I did this my blogs went down from 8000 to 240. So I would be interested to see if its just me, or if other people have the same experience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tomjack</title>
		<link>http://www.seomunchies.com/seo-munchies-news/not-me/comment-page-1/#comment-547</link>
		<dc:creator>tomjack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2010 00:30:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seomunchies.com/?p=1026#comment-547</guid>
		<description>Howard- that sounds a lot like what I experienced.  It took me almost two weeks of full time searching/verifying to get about 77 verified MUs.  The GVH button helped a lot though, and now I have over 200, and I just created about 10,000 blog accounts in 2-3 days with traffic base.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Howard- that sounds a lot like what I experienced.  It took me almost two weeks of full time searching/verifying to get about 77 verified MUs.  The GVH button helped a lot though, and now I have over 200, and I just created about 10,000 blog accounts in 2-3 days with traffic base.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tomjack</title>
		<link>http://www.seomunchies.com/seo-munchies-news/not-me/comment-page-1/#comment-546</link>
		<dc:creator>tomjack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jun 2010 17:25:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seomunchies.com/?p=1026#comment-546</guid>
		<description>Chad- my best suggestion as to how you can eliminate some of your workload regarding support and answering questions, is simply to allow people like myself to post &quot;unmoderated&quot; posts to these blogs.  I personally have tried to post about 6 or 7 comments/questions in the last month, and each one of them says &quot;your post is awaiting moderation.&quot;  If you would have simply let me post my questions, I&#039;m sure other users of traffic X suite could have answered them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chad- my best suggestion as to how you can eliminate some of your workload regarding support and answering questions, is simply to allow people like myself to post &#8220;unmoderated&#8221; posts to these blogs.  I personally have tried to post about 6 or 7 comments/questions in the last month, and each one of them says &#8220;your post is awaiting moderation.&#8221;  If you would have simply let me post my questions, I&#8217;m sure other users of traffic X suite could have answered them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dubhlinn</title>
		<link>http://www.seomunchies.com/seo-munchies-news/not-me/comment-page-1/#comment-511</link>
		<dc:creator>dubhlinn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jun 2010 05:59:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seomunchies.com/?p=1026#comment-511</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the post Chad although i see you are quite busy i understand the delays now much better.
You may have received a mail from Keith re: me with response delays with my Traffic X problems.
When you do have time i am sure you will look after me.
Also think Ron&#039;s Suggestions hold some weight a FAQ section or a webinar.
Dubhlinn</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the post Chad although i see you are quite busy i understand the delays now much better.<br />
You may have received a mail from Keith re: me with response delays with my Traffic X problems.<br />
When you do have time i am sure you will look after me.<br />
Also think Ron&#8217;s Suggestions hold some weight a FAQ section or a webinar.<br />
Dubhlinn</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Howard</title>
		<link>http://www.seomunchies.com/seo-munchies-news/not-me/comment-page-1/#comment-510</link>
		<dc:creator>Howard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2010 21:39:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seomunchies.com/?p=1026#comment-510</guid>
		<description>Hi Chad,
I was wondering if you could help me with this? I have been running scout, checking base and verifier non-stop and keeping records of its progress and on 6-16 at 11:15am I had 543 Verified MUs and 12 blogs in save file (I just started a new Mu Account) but then today 6-18 at 5:20pm I have 547 Verified MUs and 60 blogs. Do you think everything is running fine? It seems like I should have found more than 3 VMUs in 54 hrs. Is it possible I am over searching? I am running 2 instances of AAMX, 1 instance of MAM2 and I always have SEO-TB Finder running. I am using 2 different computers and one of them has an Intel CORE i5 processor so it can handle a lot of programs. I think tomorrow I am going to set-up a computer at my In-laws house and leave Traffic X Suite running for a week or so just to see if searching from a different IP address brings me better results. I just wanted to know what you think about this.
Thank You!
Howard</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Chad,<br />
I was wondering if you could help me with this? I have been running scout, checking base and verifier non-stop and keeping records of its progress and on 6-16 at 11:15am I had 543 Verified MUs and 12 blogs in save file (I just started a new Mu Account) but then today 6-18 at 5:20pm I have 547 Verified MUs and 60 blogs. Do you think everything is running fine? It seems like I should have found more than 3 VMUs in 54 hrs. Is it possible I am over searching? I am running 2 instances of AAMX, 1 instance of MAM2 and I always have SEO-TB Finder running. I am using 2 different computers and one of them has an Intel CORE i5 processor so it can handle a lot of programs. I think tomorrow I am going to set-up a computer at my In-laws house and leave Traffic X Suite running for a week or so just to see if searching from a different IP address brings me better results. I just wanted to know what you think about this.<br />
Thank You!<br />
Howard</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

